Best Pipedrive Alternatives
Looking for a better option than Pipedrive? Here are the top-rated alternatives.
Top 3 alternatives to Pipedrive
HubSpot CRM
Free · paid from $15/mo
freemium
Twinover Score
9.0
out of 10
Free CRM with paid Sales Hub tiers. Starter from $15/seat/mo, Professional $90/seat/mo.
Pros
- ✓ Strong free tier
- ✓ Marketing and sales in one
- ✓ Excellent onboarding
Cons
- ✕ Costs escalate fast
- ✕ Contact-tier pricing traps
Salesforce Sales Cloud
From $25/mo
subscription
Twinover Score
8.7
out of 10
Enterprise CRM. Starter $25/user/mo, Pro $100, Enterprise $165, Unlimited $330.
Pros
- ✓ Endless customisation
- ✓ Largest app ecosystem
- ✓ Enterprise governance
Cons
- ✕ Needs an admin
- ✕ Expensive per seat
Zoho CRM
From $14/mo
subscription
Twinover Score
8.2
out of 10
Value CRM with deep automation. Standard $14/user/mo, Professional $23, Enterprise $40.
Pros
- ✓ Low cost per seat
- ✓ Workflow automation
- ✓ Suite integration
Cons
- ✕ Dated UX in places
- ✕ Support inconsistent
People also compare
Other head-to-heads shoppers open from this page.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the best alternative to Pipedrive?
- HubSpot CRM is the highest-scoring alternative to Pipedrive on Twinover with a Twinover Score of 9.0/10. Free CRM with paid Sales Hub tiers. Starter from $15/seat/mo, Professional $90/seat/mo.
- Is there a free alternative to Pipedrive?
- Yes. HubSpot CRM is free to start with paid upgrades. Free CRM with paid Sales Hub tiers. Starter from $15/seat/mo, Professional $90/seat/mo.
- How does Twinover score Pipedrive?
- Pipedrive has a Twinover Score of 8.5/10. The score weighs pricing model, feature depth and known trade-offs: Very fast to adopt, Clear pipeline visuals, Affordable versus Light marketing features, Reporting basic on low tiers.
- How many crm alternatives does Twinover compare?
- Twinover tracks 4 crm tools, including Pipedrive, and publishes a head-to-head comparison for every pair.
Related Pipedrive comparisons
Jump straight to the head-to-head pages and category rankings crawlers and readers use most.