Head-to-Head Comparison
Loom vs ScreenPal
Detailed side-by-side analysis of features, pricing, pros, and trade-offs.
Yearly cost calculator
- Loom$900/yrCheapest paid plan, priced per user · free plan also available
- ScreenPal$36/yrCheapest paid plan, flat price · free plan also available
Based on each tool's lowest published paid price. Taxes and annual-billing discounts vary.
Loom
Free · paid from $15/mo
Twinover Score
8.6
out of 10
Twinover Verdict
Loom leads overall by 1.0 points.
Based on pricing value, workflow efficiency, and reliability.
ScreenPal
Free · paid from $3/mo
Twinover Score
7.6
out of 10
Feature and pricing breakdown
Specification
Pricing Model
freemium
freemium
Twinover Score
Twinover Score
8.6
out of 10
Twinover Score
7.6
out of 10
Pros
- Instant shareable links
- Viewer comments and reactions
- AI titles and summaries
- Very cheap paid plan
- Easy for beginners
- Built-in editor
Cons
- Free videos capped at 5 minutes
- Gets pricey for teams
- Watermark on free plan
- Dated interface
Where to get each option
People also compare
Other head-to-heads shoppers open from this page.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Loom better than ScreenPal?
- Loom scores higher on Twinover (8.6/10 vs 7.6/10). Loom stands out for Instant shareable links and Viewer comments and reactions, while ScreenPal is worth picking when very cheap paid plan matters more.
- Which is cheaper, Loom or ScreenPal?
- Loom has the lower entry cost — its plan is freemium. Async screen and camera recording with instant share links. Free plan with 5-minute videos; Business $15/user/mo billed yearly.
- What are the main drawbacks of Loom and ScreenPal?
- Loom: Free videos capped at 5 minutes, Gets pricey for teams. ScreenPal: Watermark on free plan, Dated interface.
Related comparisons and alternatives
Continue researching with neighbouring head-to-heads and full alternative lists.