Best Loom Alternatives
Looking for a better option than Loom? Here are the top-rated alternatives.
Top 3 alternatives to Loom
OBS Studio
Free plan available
free
Twinover Score
8.7
out of 10
Free open-source recording and live-streaming software for Windows, Mac and Linux.
Pros
- ✓ Completely free
- ✓ Pro-grade scenes and sources
- ✓ Streams to any platform
Cons
- ✕ Steep learning curve
- ✕ No built-in sharing or editing
Camtasia
From $14.99/mo
subscription
Twinover Score
7.9
out of 10
Screen recorder with a built-in editor for tutorials and training videos. Paid; from $179.88/yr.
Pros
- ✓ Editor built for tutorials
- ✓ Cursor and zoom effects
- ✓ Quizzes for training
Cons
- ✕ Expensive yearly price
- ✕ No free plan
ScreenPal
Free · paid from $3/mo
freemium
Twinover Score
7.6
out of 10
Simple screen recorder and editor popular in education. Free plan; Deluxe $3/mo billed yearly.
Pros
- ✓ Very cheap paid plan
- ✓ Easy for beginners
- ✓ Built-in editor
Cons
- ✕ Watermark on free plan
- ✕ Dated interface
People also compare
Other head-to-heads shoppers open from this page.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the best alternative to Loom?
- OBS Studio is the highest-scoring alternative to Loom on Twinover with a Twinover Score of 8.7/10. Free open-source recording and live-streaming software for Windows, Mac and Linux.
- Is there a free alternative to Loom?
- Yes. OBS Studio is completely free. Free open-source recording and live-streaming software for Windows, Mac and Linux.
- How does Twinover score Loom?
- Loom has a Twinover Score of 8.6/10. The score weighs pricing model, feature depth and known trade-offs: Instant shareable links, Viewer comments and reactions, AI titles and summaries versus Free videos capped at 5 minutes, Gets pricey for teams.
- How many screen recording alternatives does Twinover compare?
- Twinover tracks 4 screen recording tools, including Loom, and publishes a head-to-head comparison for every pair.
Related Loom comparisons
Jump straight to the head-to-head pages and category rankings crawlers and readers use most.